
I wandered along to St Paul's last week. I was interested to see the Occupy the London Stock Exchange campsite for myself. It was a very cheery place to be. There was a first aid tent and a legal tent, a food tent and a piano tent. A library and a tent university. There were lots of people, some of them demonstrators, some of them onlookers and quite a lot of media. The demonstrators were quite happy to chat to everyone and the whole feel was very sociable. The health and safety conversations had begun; tents were being moved, barriers had been put up to ensure that fire exits were clear. The barriers were being decorated with flowers and pieces of ribbon.
There are lots of signs and drawings (all hand written/drawn)- and it seemed lots of points of view. Whilst the protesters have been criticised for the lack of clarity in their demands, I liked the 'another world is possible' tape that was around the site - it's surely time to think of alternatives.
It was very cheering to see St Paul's surrounded with so many people. Having people living close to the cathedral seemed to feel true to its history. There would have been lots of people and stalls around churches and cathedrals. They used to be living places and not just buildings to be looked at. By comparison, Paternoster Square (now the home of the Stock Exchange) was empty and seemed sterile. Now it's full of police and security guards watching the protesters (from the safety of their barriers).
I've been asked to leave the square for taking photos in the past. It was a couple of years ago and I hadn't actually realised that the Stock Exchange was there until I was asked to leave. I was taking a photo of the Elizabeth Frink statue when the security guard told me that no-one was allowed to take photographs. Our 'free country' has all sorts of rules and these days a lot of them seem to be about preventing people taking photos.
The day of my visit was the day when the church was beginning to complain about the loss of visitors and I thought I'd pop in and add some cash to their coffers. It was easy enough to get into the cathedral. There were more people around than usual but no risk to my health and safety (or anyone else's). But I was rather shocked to find that it costs nearly fifteen quid to visit (£14.50) which seemed a bit steep when I only had half an hour to spare.
But it did make me wonder whether it was the money that was bothering the Cathedral. Perhaps not surprisingly, if you check out their list of Patrons and Supporters it includes most of the banks and the London Stock Exchange.

